{"id":25892,"date":"2026-04-15T01:08:50","date_gmt":"2026-04-15T01:08:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/the-hidden-costs-of-metamask-swaps-gas-fees-explained\/"},"modified":"2026-04-15T01:08:50","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T01:08:50","slug":"the-hidden-costs-of-metamask-swaps-gas-fees-explained","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/the-hidden-costs-of-metamask-swaps-gas-fees-explained\/","title":{"rendered":"The Hidden Costs of MetaMask Swaps: Gas Fees Explained"},"content":{"rendered":"

A user opens MetaMask, selects two tokens, enters an amount, and sees a swap quote that appears reasonable. They approve the transaction and pay the displayed network fee. Hours later, the swap settles, and they realize the effective cost was substantially higher than the headline figure suggested. The gap between what MetaMask showed on screen and what actually left their wallet illustrates a critical gap in how most users understand blockchain transaction economics. The problem is not MetaMask itself; it is that swap mechanics, gas calculations, and fee structures operate under rules that the wallet interface does not fully expose.<\/p>\n

Understanding why a MetaMask swap costs more than expected requires separating three distinct expenses: the base network gas fee required by the blockchain, the liquidity routing fee charged by swap aggregators or market makers, and the price slippage that occurs when an order executes at a different rate than quoted. Each component is real. Each reduces the amount of tokens received. Yet the MetaMask interface often presents them as a single undifferentiated cost, leaving users with incomplete information about where their money actually goes.<\/p>\n

\"MetaMask<\/p>\n

How blockchain gas fees work across EVM networks<\/h2>\n

Every transaction on Ethereum or any EVM compatible<\/strong> blockchain requires computational work to be performed by the network. The cost of that work is measured in gas units. A simple token transfer consumes fewer gas units than a complex swap involving multiple smart contract interactions. The price of each gas unit fluctuates based on network demand. When many users are transacting simultaneously, the network becomes congested, and the price per gas unit rises. When demand is low, it falls.<\/p>\n

MetaMask displays this as a simple line item: “Gas” or “Network Fee.” In reality, it is the product of three variables. The first is base fee<\/strong>, which is the minimum price the network requires per unit of gas. This is burned and does not go to validators or miners. The second is priority fee<\/strong>, which users add to incentivize faster confirmation. The third is the total gas units required for the specific transaction. A swap on Ethereum mainnet that consumes 150,000 gas units at a base fee of 50 gwei and a priority fee of 2 gwei results in a total gas cost of roughly 7.8 million gwei, or approximately 0.0078 ETH. At $3,000 per ether, that alone becomes $23.<\/p>\n

The complication is that MetaMask must estimate gas consumption before the transaction is submitted. The wallet calculates based on transaction type and current network state, but the actual amount used depends on execution details that are not fully known until the transaction settles. If execution is simpler than expected, gas refunds occur; if it is more complex, the transaction could fail or consume additional gas. A failed or reverted transaction still consumes gas and leaves nothing in the user’s possession except a reduction in their balance.<\/p>\n

Across different EVM-compatible chains, the same transaction type may consume the same gas units, but the price per unit varies dramatically. Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, and other Layer 2 or sidechain networks have substantially lower gas prices than Ethereum mainnet because they have different network architectures and security models. A swap that costs $20 on Ethereum might cost $1 on Polygon and $0.50 on Arbitrum. This is not because the swap is different; it is because the underlying network economics are different. Users who regularly pay Ethereum-level fees and then switch to a cheaper chain often discover that their assumptions about swap costs are no longer accurate.<\/p>\n

The gap between quoted price and actual execution cost<\/h2>\n

When a user enters an amount and sees a swap quote in MetaMask, they are viewing an estimate of the output they will receive if the transaction executes at current market rates. That estimate is not a guarantee. Between the moment the user views the quote and the moment the transaction settles on the blockchain, market prices can move. If they move unfavorably, the user receives fewer tokens than quoted. That shortfall is called slippage<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

MetaMask allows users to set a slippage tolerance, typically defaulting to 0.5 percent for standard swaps. If the actual output falls outside that tolerance window, the transaction reverts, and the user loses only the gas fee. If slippage is within tolerance, the transaction executes, but the user realizes a loss compared to the quoted price. During volatile market conditions or when swapping illiquid tokens, slippage can easily exceed 1 to 5 percent or more. A user swapping $1,000 worth of tokens with 2 percent slippage receives $980 worth, paying an invisible $20 cost beyond the gas fee.<\/p>\n

The mechanism driving slippage is simple: most MetaMask swaps route through decentralized exchanges or aggregators that match orders from liquidity pools. When a large order executes against a limited pool, it moves the price. The first portion of the order executes at the best price; subsequent portions execute at progressively worse prices. The average price paid is the execution price. If demand is high and liquidity is low, the difference between the quoted price and execution price widens. Professional traders manage this through limit orders or off-chain routing; MetaMask’s swap interface presents slippage as an afterthought.<\/p>\n

A second invisible cost arises from aggregator markup. When MetaMask facilitates a swap, it routes the order through liquidity sources managed by its aggregation partners. Those partners take a small cut, typically 0.5 to 1 percent, for coordinating the route and providing execution. That fee does not appear as a separate line item. It is embedded in the quoted price. Users comparing quotes across wallets or directly on a decentralized exchange may notice that the same token pair produces different prices depending on routing. The difference is often these aggregator fees and the specific liquidity sources used.<\/p>\n

Gas estimation errors and failed transactions<\/h2>\n

MetaMask’s gas estimation is usually accurate, but not always. The wallet simulates the transaction against the current state of the blockchain to predict gas consumption. If the blockchain state changes between simulation and execution, or if the simulation itself contains an error, the actual gas used can differ significantly. In extreme cases, the transaction can run out of gas midway through execution, resulting in a revert. The user’s original tokens remain in their wallet, but the gas fee\u2014sometimes $50 or more on Ethereum\u2014is consumed with nothing to show for it.<\/p>\n

Failed swaps most commonly occur in three scenarios. First, when network conditions change rapidly. A swap simulated when gas prices are stable might fail if prices spike before the transaction mines, or if other transactions cause unexpected network congestion. Second, when interacting with poorly designed or vulnerable smart contracts. A token with unusual fee mechanisms, for example, might behave differently on-chain than the simulation predicts. Third, when the liquidity pool used in the route becomes empty or insufficient before the transaction executes. This is rare but can happen during flash crashes or when the same liquidity is targeted by many simultaneous orders.<\/p>\n

Users sometimes respond to a failed swap by immediately re-submitting the transaction without investigating the cause. If the underlying condition that caused the failure persists, the second attempt will also fail, wasting more gas. The correct procedure is to wait, check the transaction hash on a block explorer, examine what error occurred, and only re-attempt after understanding the issue or after network conditions change. MetaMask does not always make this distinction clear, and the interface can create a false sense of urgency that leads to cascading losses.<\/p>\n

MetaMask fees versus other wallet and exchange options<\/h2>\n

MetaMask itself does not charge a fee for swaps; the wallet is free to download and use. However, the routes available through MetaMask’s integrated swap feature are subject to the same gas fees, slippage, and aggregator costs as any other routing service. The question is not whether MetaMask is expensive, but whether a MetaMask download extension<\/a> user can reduce costs by using alternative services.<\/p>\n

For Ethereum mainnet transactions, centralized exchanges such as Coinbase or Kraken often offer lower-cost swaps because they execute trades internally and only settle the result on-chain. The trade-off is custody: the user must deposit funds into the exchange’s account to use their swap service. For users who prefer self-custody, performing the same swap using MetaMask and routing through Uniswap directly, rather than through MetaMask’s aggregator, can sometimes save the aggregator markup. Users can access Uniswap’s interface independently in a web browser and connect their MetaMask wallet without using MetaMask’s built-in swap tool. The gas fee remains identical, but the routing fee may be lower.<\/p>\n

On cheaper EVM chains, the absolute cost difference becomes smaller. A swap on Polygon might cost $1 total regardless of whether it routes through MetaMask, Uniswap, or another interface. In that context, the interface convenience becomes more important than the marginal cost difference. The effective advice is that MetaMask swaps are not overpriced compared to alternatives; they simply reflect underlying network economics. Users can optimize by choosing which network to use, understanding slippage tolerance before swapping, and occasionally checking whether direct routing to a decentralized exchange would produce a better rate.<\/p>\n

How to estimate and reduce swap costs before executing<\/h2>\n

Before approving a swap, a user should extract three pieces of information from the MetaMask interface. First, the estimated gas fee<\/strong>, displayed in the transaction details. Second, the slippage tolerance<\/strong>, which determines how much price movement is acceptable. Third, the minimum output amount<\/strong>, which is the quoted output reduced by the slippage percentage. These three numbers tell the user the worst-case cost of the swap.<\/p>\n

To reduce gas costs, users can deploy several tactics. On Ethereum mainnet, swapping during off-peak hours\u2014typically late evening UTC\u2014can reduce network demand and lower gas prices by 20 to 50 percent. Batch multiple swaps into a single transaction, if the wallet interface supports it, can distribute gas costs across more value. Moving to a cheaper EVM-compatible chain such as Arbitrum or Optimism reduces gas costs dramatically. These chains were designed specifically to lower transaction costs while maintaining Ethereum-level security through rollup technology. A user willing to bridge their tokens to Arbitrum and execute the swap there can reduce total costs by an order of magnitude.<\/p>\n

Slippage optimization requires understanding the tokens being swapped. High-liquidity token pairs such as ETH to USDC have tight spreads and can tolerate 0.1 to 0.5 percent slippage safely. Illiquid or newly launched tokens may require 1 to 5 percent or more to ensure execution. Setting slippage too low risks repeated failed transactions, each costing gas. Setting it too high accepts unnecessary losses. The correct approach is to start with a low slippage tolerance, attempt the swap, and only increase if execution fails and no other condition has changed.<\/p>\n

Timing also affects cost. Swapping large amounts in a single transaction creates substantial price impact and slippage. Breaking a large swap into smaller orders over time\u2014a technique called dollar-cost averaging in investment contexts\u2014can reduce the average execution price and total slippage cost. MetaMask’s interface does not explicitly recommend this, but users can manually execute multiple smaller swaps to achieve the effect. The trade-off is that each transaction incurs separate gas fees, so the optimization only works when slippage savings exceed the additional gas cost.<\/p>\n

Understanding MEV and advanced cost considerations<\/h2>\n

Beyond gas and slippage, a third cost mechanism exists that most MetaMask users never encounter directly: maximal extractable value, or MEV<\/strong>. When a user’s swap transaction enters the public mempool, bots and searchers can observe it. They may then submit their own transactions designed to execute immediately before or after the user’s transaction. This reordering can allow them to extract value from the user’s transaction by buying or selling tokens at the user’s expense.<\/p>\n

The most straightforward MEV attack is a “sandwich.” A bot observes a swap about to execute, submits a transaction immediately before it to move the price, lets the user’s swap execute at the worse price, and then submits another transaction after to profit from the price movement. The user receives fewer tokens than expected, and the difference flows to the bot. For a large swap on a decentralized exchange, this can easily cost 0.5 to 2 percent or more. MetaMask does not prevent MEV; no standard self-custodial wallet can. The protection against MEV involves either accepting the risk, using private transaction routing services that hide pending transactions, or using centralized exchanges where transactions are not visible in a public mempool.<\/p>\n

Private transaction routing, offered through services such as Flashbots Protect or similar MEV mitigation layers, hides the pending transaction from the public mempool but routes it through alternative channels to validators or builders. This can reduce or eliminate MEV extraction, but it also introduces reliance on a service provider. The trade-off between decentralization and MEV protection is not trivial. Users swapping small amounts may find that the risk of MEV is negligible compared to the obvious costs. Users swapping large amounts, especially in low-liquidity pairs, should consider whether MEV protection is worth the implicit trust in an external service.<\/p>\n

Network selection and long-term cost strategy<\/h2>\n

The most impactful decision a MetaMask user makes regarding swap costs is often which blockchain network to use. Ethereum mainnet provides maximum security and liquidity but charges the highest gas fees. Layer 2 networks such as Arbitrum and Optimism charge 50 to 100 times lower gas fees while inheriting Ethereum’s security through rollup technology. Sidechains such as Polygon offer lower costs but with a different security model. Choosing the right network for a particular swap depends on the value at stake, the liquidity available, and the user’s security preferences.<\/p>\n

A long-term cost strategy involves routinely considering whether to conduct small, frequent swaps on a cheap network or to accumulate value on a cheap network and execute larger swaps periodically. The calculation is straightforward: if one swap costs $0.50 on Arbitrum and $10 on Ethereum, a user can execute twenty swaps on Arbitrum for the cost of one on Ethereum. However, bridging tokens from Ethereum to Arbitrum itself costs gas on Ethereum, typically $20 to $50. That bridge cost makes sense if the user will conduct multiple subsequent transactions on the destination network.<\/p>\n

MetaMask’s multichain support makes switching networks relatively simple. Users can add networks to MetaMask’s interface, and bridges such as the Arbitrum bridge or Optimism’s gateway facilitate moving tokens between networks. The friction is lower than it once was. What remains unchanged is the fundamental economics: cheaper networks exist because they are different from Ethereum, not because they are free. Users benefit from this choice, but they should make it deliberately rather than drifting into expensive transactions through ignorance of alternatives.<\/p>\n

What users should verify before confirming any swap<\/h2>\n

Before clicking “Confirm” on a swap, a user should mentally run through a five-step verification. First, verify the token addresses. Scams sometimes create fake tokens with names nearly identical to legitimate ones. MetaMask shows a token symbol and address; checking that address against an official source prevents a devastating loss. Second, verify the swap direction. Confirming a swap that offers the wrong output token is easy to do under time pressure or distraction. Third, verify the gas price makes sense for the network. Abnormally high gas prices might indicate a simulation error or network congestion that justifies waiting.<\/p>\n

Fourth, verify the slippage tolerance is appropriate. A 0.5 percent default is sensible for most tokens but may be dangerously low for illiquid tokens and dangerously high for high-value swaps of liquid tokens. Fifth, cross-reference the quoted output with an independent price source if the amount is substantial. Visiting a decentralized exchange’s interface directly or checking a price API can confirm whether MetaMask’s quote is in line with market rates. None of these steps takes more than a minute, and collectively they prevent the majority of costly mistakes.<\/p>\n

The last detail is gas estimation timing. MetaMask updates gas estimates periodically, but manual refresh before confirmation can catch changes. On Ethereum mainnet, gas prices can swing significantly within minutes. A user who estimates gas, attends to something else for five minutes, and then confirms may find that the actual gas cost is materially higher. MetaMask shows the maximum gas fee the transaction will charge if executed, but users sometimes confuse this with the current estimate and then experience sticker shock when the final bill arrives. Confirming immediately after viewing the estimate reduces this gap.<\/p>\n

\n

Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n
\n

Why does a MetaMask swap show one price but execute at a different price?<\/h3>\n

The displayed quote is an estimate based on current market conditions. Between viewing the quote and transaction confirmation, market prices fluctuate. If the actual execution price is worse than the quoted price but within your slippage tolerance, the swap executes anyway. This price difference is called slippage and is a normal cost of decentralized trading. Setting a lower slippage tolerance reduces losses but risks failed transactions.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Can I reduce MetaMask swap costs by using a different network?<\/h3>\n

Yes. Layer 2 networks like Arbitrum and Optimism charge 50 to 100 times lower gas fees than Ethereum mainnet while maintaining similar security. The trade-off is that liquidity and available token pairs may be smaller. Bridging tokens to a cheaper network does incur an initial gas cost on the source network, but that cost is quickly recouped if you plan to execute multiple swaps on the destination chain.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

What is MEV and how does it affect MetaMask swaps?<\/h3>\n

MEV stands for maximal extractable value. Bots and searchers can observe pending transactions in the public mempool and reorder them to extract profit at the user’s expense, typically through “sandwich” attacks. This can reduce the output of a swap by 0.5 to 2 percent or more, especially for large swaps of illiquid tokens. Private routing services can mitigate MEV but require trust in an external provider. Most swaps of small amounts are unaffected.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A user opens MetaMask, selects two tokens, enters an amount, and sees a swap quote that appears reasonable. They approve the transaction and pay the displayed network fee. Hours later, the swap settles, and they realize the effective cost was substantially higher than the headline figure suggested. The gap between what MetaMask showed on screen […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe Hidden Costs of MetaMask Swaps: Gas Fees Explained - monika<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/the-hidden-costs-of-metamask-swaps-gas-fees-explained\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Hidden Costs of MetaMask Swaps: Gas Fees Explained - monika\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A user opens MetaMask, selects two tokens, enters an amount, and sees a swap quote that appears reasonable. They approve the transaction and pay the displayed network fee. Hours later, the swap settles, and they realize the effective cost was substantially higher than the headline figure suggested. The gap between what MetaMask showed on screen […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/the-hidden-costs-of-metamask-swaps-gas-fees-explained\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"monika\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-15T01:08:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/sitesv\/AG8ngQVF9r3keIEEykBMlzL0jS2t8emA0EXFVM9wycJr7w1G-0FOPhRI0GqC3evKWeoTO0UMwBde6HufheEHzVEyK8iNh9T68NRVGFLVeHtfNXbGxRySujCmblZxqtTj5nZ2U2pKL6ScLwphbOa9qPkmuubpOqEKcMdn0p6afED9-vt162FPYv0GAGtpWIkyAe0qL7CQ6IECyhGW94E\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"joeshpinemonika20\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"joeshpinemonika20\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"15 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/the-hidden-costs-of-metamask-swaps-gas-fees-explained\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/the-hidden-costs-of-metamask-swaps-gas-fees-explained\/\",\"name\":\"The Hidden Costs of MetaMask Swaps: Gas Fees Explained - monika\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-15T01:08:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-15T01:08:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/#\/schema\/person\/eb47d186628d8b8902d9e2aea60bb048\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/the-hidden-costs-of-metamask-swaps-gas-fees-explained\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/\",\"name\":\"monika\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/#\/schema\/person\/eb47d186628d8b8902d9e2aea60bb048\",\"name\":\"joeshpinemonika20\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/87ed8e0fadc8622b3e2ef879428f765e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/87ed8e0fadc8622b3e2ef879428f765e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"joeshpinemonika20\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/author\/joeshpinemonika20\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Hidden Costs of MetaMask Swaps: Gas Fees Explained - monika","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/the-hidden-costs-of-metamask-swaps-gas-fees-explained\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Hidden Costs of MetaMask Swaps: Gas Fees Explained - monika","og_description":"A user opens MetaMask, selects two tokens, enters an amount, and sees a swap quote that appears reasonable. They approve the transaction and pay the displayed network fee. Hours later, the swap settles, and they realize the effective cost was substantially higher than the headline figure suggested. The gap between what MetaMask showed on screen […]","og_url":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/the-hidden-costs-of-metamask-swaps-gas-fees-explained\/","og_site_name":"monika","article_published_time":"2026-04-15T01:08:50+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/sitesv\/AG8ngQVF9r3keIEEykBMlzL0jS2t8emA0EXFVM9wycJr7w1G-0FOPhRI0GqC3evKWeoTO0UMwBde6HufheEHzVEyK8iNh9T68NRVGFLVeHtfNXbGxRySujCmblZxqtTj5nZ2U2pKL6ScLwphbOa9qPkmuubpOqEKcMdn0p6afED9-vt162FPYv0GAGtpWIkyAe0qL7CQ6IECyhGW94E"}],"author":"joeshpinemonika20","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"joeshpinemonika20","Est. reading time":"15 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/the-hidden-costs-of-metamask-swaps-gas-fees-explained\/","url":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/the-hidden-costs-of-metamask-swaps-gas-fees-explained\/","name":"The Hidden Costs of MetaMask Swaps: Gas Fees Explained - monika","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-15T01:08:50+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-15T01:08:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/#\/schema\/person\/eb47d186628d8b8902d9e2aea60bb048"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/the-hidden-costs-of-metamask-swaps-gas-fees-explained\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/#website","url":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/","name":"monika","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/#\/schema\/person\/eb47d186628d8b8902d9e2aea60bb048","name":"joeshpinemonika20","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/87ed8e0fadc8622b3e2ef879428f765e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/87ed8e0fadc8622b3e2ef879428f765e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"joeshpinemonika20"},"url":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/author\/joeshpinemonika20\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25892"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/36"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25892"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25892\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/developerpublish.com\/community\/joeshpinemonika20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}